Early stage entrepreneurs and investors almost always want to understand “The addressable market”.
As a general rule of thumb, bigger is better. Growing beats shrinking, and global trumps local (especially if it includes everyone online and/or all of China).
Ambitious entrepreneurs want to understand how their company will become a multi-billion dollar world changer. Investors want to understand how their investment is going to keep their kid’s kids in extended inheritance disputes well in to the twenty second century.
How you define the market is KEY to attracting talent, and capital.
Defining the market can be tricky because often the best markets don’t even exist. That is; don’t exist yet.
Think of a world before Radio, TV, Automobiles or Personal Computers. Early on, how would you define those markets?
In the 40s one executive defined the global market for computers as "maybe a dozen".
Truly pioneering companies often sell something the world is not yet demanding. This can be discouraging for an entrepreneur, but the great ones persevere. Just think of it as “unencumbered by predefined demand”.
Radio, Automobile, TV, and Personal Computers all were developed in the HOPE that a larger market would emerge.
In the 60s many people thought the entire addressable market for cell phones consisted of only Maxwell Smart!
In the late 1970s, the market for micro-personal-pocket-sized-headset-music was about zero. Sounds risky!
This was before Sony launched the “Walkman”. Yet even then, the market for consumer electronics, radios, or cassette players was Billions.
When the Sony Founder was describing the WalkMan opportunity to potential hires and investors do you think he pointed to zero or to billions?
So size does matter, but is how you talk about it can matter even more. Which brings me to government, they sure know how to talk.
(BTW; I would have titled my post “size matters”, but I did not want a red flag from the ant-spam-algorithms).
When government talks about saving (or investing) they don’t say $10 billion a year. Yearly numbers may be practical for executives who are accountable to quarterly projections, but it’s not going to generate press inside the beltway. Savvy Politicians say “$100 Billion dollars by 2017”, Sounds impressive! Adding a few more years can really pad the numbers.
I am not recommending you use this technique as an entrepreneur, but HP decided to try it out. It looks like it worked.
Recently HP announced:
“A continuation of their Print 2.0 strategy. The strategy is heavily focused on leveraging Web-based services in trying to capture a significant share of the growing number of digital pages printed each year. According to HP, 53 trillion digital pages are forecast to be printed in 2010, creating a market valued at more than $296 billion.”
Bravo HP, plenty of media pick up. They could have said a trillion dollars by 2017. Just as accurate, but a trillion would have been ignored as over-hype. They could have said billions a month. Just as accurate, but that also would have been ignored as underwhelming. HP got it just right.
Any way you measure the market for printed business documents (i.e.; Business Plans, proposals, PowerPoint presentations, training material, etc.) is large and growing. However in 1999, when we were first raising money for Mimeo.com, we had some trouble convincing investors there was a market for printing documents over the internet. Luckily, we were able to convince a few investors of the market potential, and today Mimeo has over 450 employees who profitably services thousands of companies, delivering documents to a market that could have been defined as “almost nothing” a decade ago.
For entrepreneurs worn down by accusations that their market is too small, I encourage you to persevere. Ignore those potential investors that are too small mined grasp your market’s potential. For entrepreneurs building next generation music sites; your market is too small, give up.